torn

the citybeat review is up:

http://www.citybeat.com/current/onstage3.shtml

and now i don't know how to feel. is it better to be mentioned in a bad review or not mentioned at all? he slammed the lovers, praised bottom and the mechanicals and completely ignored me. was i that bad that he couldn't even bring himself to be harsh? or was i that forgettable that he forgot to even mention me? or perhaps his editor read his review of my performance and decided it was too mean and it would be better to not say anything (ye olde thumper rule)? regardless, i'll have to wait a bit longer to get my first official review. i had hoped to at least get noticed. as it is, i gained less attention than the costumes. i suppose it's what i should have expected.

at least gina will be happy with the review, as it will vindicate her belief that we've bastardized the bard.

off to grading hell.
Æ

tunes: old 97's - let the idiot speak